fh1 small molecule (AbMole Bioscience)
Structured Review

Fh1 Small Molecule, supplied by AbMole Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/product/fh1+small+molecule/pmc12064995-55-83-84?v=AbMole+Bioscience
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
Images
1) Product Images from "The Potential Hepatocyte Differentiation Targets and MSC Proliferation by FH1"
Article Title: The Potential Hepatocyte Differentiation Targets and MSC Proliferation by FH1
Journal: Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine
doi: 10.1111/jcmm.70601
Figure Legend Snippet: The potential target gene of FH1‐induced hepatocyte differentiation. (a) Venn diagram of the intersecting targets of FH1 and hepatocyte differentiation‐related genes. (b) PPI interaction network of FH1 targets and the intersecting targets of hepatocyte differentiation.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: HGF/c‐Met signalling is essential for FH1‐induced hepatocyte differentiation. (a–d) GO enrichment analysis results demonstrating that the FH1‐targeted genes involved in hepatocyte differentiation are associated with biological process (BP), cellular component (CC) and molecular function (MF) categories. (e) KEGG pathway analysis results. (f) Venn diagram demonstrating the overlapping Met interactors between the BioGRID and HIPPIE databases and the HIPPIE score for overlapping proteins.
Techniques Used:
Figure Legend Snippet: The binding of FH1 to CIN85 and c‐Met. (a) Vina score of FH1 and hub genes according to the CB. Dock 2 database. (b) Predicted binding sites of CIN85 and c‐Met for FH1. (c) Real‐time kinetic binding sensorgrams of different concentrations of FH1 (125–1000 μmol/L) are shown. The response (nm) indicates the optical thickness of the SSA biosensor layer.
Techniques Used: Binding Assay
Figure Legend Snippet: FH1 induces MSCs migration. (a) Volcano plot showing differentially expressed genes in FH1‐treated samples. (b) GSEA revealed that the differentially expressed genes were enriched mainly in the HGF/c‐Met signalling pathway. (c) MSCs seeded in six‐well plates and treated with FH1 for 24, 48 and 96 h. At the endpoint of treatment, the cells were stained with Actin‐Tracker Green‐488. The PF + FH1 group was pretreated with PF4217903 for 1 h and then cultured in medium containing 15 μM FH1 for 48 h ( n = 3). (d) FH1 had a chemoattractant effect in hUC‐MSCs. Cells were left untreated or treated with FH1 for 48 h or pretreated with PF4217903 for 1 h before FH1 was added to the Transwell directional migration assay. All the experiments are representative of three replicates ( n = 3).
Techniques Used: Migration, Staining, Cell Culture
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of FH1 on MSCs proliferation. (a, b) Cells were seeded at a density of 5000 cells/cm 2 in 6‐well microplates in EM and treated with or without 15 μM FH1 for the indicated times. The cells were pulsed with EdU for 2 h and then observed via fluorescence microscopy or harvested for flow cytometric analysis ( n = 3). (c) Cells were cultured in EM with or without 15 μM FH1 treatment for 24, 48, or 72 h and then stained with 1× iodide staining solution containing 0.05 mg/mL propidium iodide, 1 mg/mL RNase A and 0.3% Triton X‐100. The cells were incubated in the dark for 30 min. The number of cells in G0/G1 phase was analysed through flow cytometry ( n = 3). (d, e) Western blotting analysis of the protein expression levels of p21, p27 and bcl‐2 in MSCs cultured in EM medium either left untreated or treated with FH1 for the indicated times ( n = 3). Full‐length blots/gels are presented in Figure . Data information: The bars represent the means of three independent experiments ± SEM. Statistics: Two‐tailed unpaired Student's t ‐test. ***p < 0.001; ****p < 0.0001.
Techniques Used: Fluorescence, Microscopy, Cell Culture, Staining, Incubation, Flow Cytometry, Western Blot, Expressing, Two Tailed Test
Figure Legend Snippet: Effect of FH1 treatment on the expression of Met in MSCs. (a) Western immunoblotting analysis of c‐Met expression and FH1‐induced activation in MSCs ( n = 3). Full‐length blots/gels are presented in Figures and . (b) Quiescent MSCs were either left unstimulated (−) or stimulated with 15 μM FH1 for the indicated times, and total cell protein was examined through Western blotting and immunoprobed with antibodies against the active phosphorylated forms of ERK1/2, p38 and Akt (pERK1/2, pp38 and pAkt) or against total proteins (ERK1/2, p38 and Akt). Protein phosphorylation induced by 10 min of FH1 stimulation was inhibited by pretreatment for 1 h with the following specific inhibitors: PD98059 (30 M PD), SB230580 (30 M SB) and LY29402 (100 nM WM). All the experiments are representative of three replicates ( n = 3). Full‐length blots/gels of AKT and p‐AKT are presented in Figure ; Full‐length blots/gels of ERK and p‐ERK are presented in Figure ; Full‐length blots/gels of p38 and p‐p38 are presented in Figure . (c) Western blotting analysis of the expression of Met and β‐catenin in MSCs with FH1‐induced activation. Cells treated with FH1 tend to express high levels of the receptors of Met and β‐catenin. Pretreatment with the specific inhibitors PD98059 (30 M PD), SB230580 (30 M SB), or LY29402 (100 nM WM) had no effect on the expression of Met, β‐catenin or the proliferation marker PCNA in MSCs with or without with FH1. Full‐length blots/gels are presented in Figures and . All the experiments are representative of three replicates ( n = 3).
Techniques Used: Expressing, Western Blot, Activation Assay, Phospho-proteomics, Marker
Figure Legend Snippet: The RNA profile of FH1‐induced hepatocytes. (a) Hierarchical clustering of PHHs, FH1‐iHeps, HSs and HBs according to differentially expressed genes. (b) Heatmap showing the expression of selected genes in PHHs versus FH1‐iHeps. (c) KEGG pathway analysis results. (d) KOG results showing the differential signalling pathway‐related functions.
Techniques Used: Expressing
Figure Legend Snippet: The therapeutic effects of FH1‐ iHeps on ALF. (a) Schematic diagram of cell transplantation into the livers of C57BL/6J mice. Mice were intraperitoneally injected with CCl 4 to induce fulminant hepatic injury. Eight hours after CCl 4 treatment, hUC‐MSCs and iHeps (1 × 10 6 cells/animal, 300 μL) were intravenously injected into the mice, and the control animals received an equal volume of PBS. (b) Kaplan–Meier survival curve of mice with ALF ( n = 6). (c) Serum levels of ALT, AST and human albumin (ALB) in CCl 4 ‐treated mice before (day 0 [d0]) and after (d7) transplantation of Huc‐MSCs or iHeps ( n = 3). (d) Macroscopic images of freshly isolated livers from mice treated with CCl 4 for 8 h; PBS, hADSCs and iHeps were intravenously injected into the mice ( n = 3). (e) H&E staining of liver sections ( n = 3). (f) PAS staining ( n = 3). (g) The integration of iHeps in mouse livers was determined by immunostaining for human ALB in serial sections ( n = 3). Scale bars = 50 μm (e, f) and 100 μm (g). Data information: The bars represent the means of three independent experiments ± SEM. Statistics: Two‐tailed unpaired Student's t ‐test.
Techniques Used: Transplantation Assay, Injection, Control, Isolation, Staining, Immunostaining, Two Tailed Test
